In an unexpected twist, the NFL is reportedly facing substantial financial repercussions following its recent collaboration with pop icon Taylor Swift. Despite her attendance at Kansas City Chiefs games creating a buzz and increasing female viewership, recent reports reveal that the league has suffered an estimated $700 million loss due to Swift’s overwhelming presence. This surprising financial fallout demonstrates how even a star as luminous as Swift can shine too brightly for some fans, leading to backlash from traditional football followers.

When Taylor Swift first appeared at a Kansas City Chiefs game on September 24, it sent shockwaves through both the music and sports worlds. Swift’s mere presence spurred an uptick in viewership, particularly among her dedicated fan base, affectionately known as Swifties. The phenomenon became known as the “Taylor Swift effect,” and initially, it appeared to work magic for the NFL. Games that Swift attended with her new beau, Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, saw a significant viewership boost across various demographics, especially among young women.

Swift’s influence transcended the stadiums, capturing the imagination of a new audience that hadn’t been traditionally interested in football. Her popularity led to a 20% increase in sponsorships and brought in new fans, with a reported 53% increase in teenage girl viewership and a 24% rise among women aged 18 to 24. This surge in female viewership was initially hailed as a triumph, providing NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell with a reason to celebrate as he stated, “It creates another group of young fans, particularly young women, that are interested in seeing why she is going to this game.”

Yet, despite the early surge in viewership and excitement, it appears that Swift’s omnipresence quickly turned sour for the NFL’s traditional audience. Some die-hard football fans found the Swift-centered media frenzy distracting and irritating. As more focus was placed on Swift’s attendance than on the games themselves, viewers began expressing their frustration. Many felt that the NFL was pandering excessively to Swifties, alienating the league’s long-standing fan base who felt the games should focus more on football than on pop culture.

Furthermore, as Swift’s attendance at games became increasingly frequent, some argued that the media attention shifted the spotlight from the players to Swift’s interactions, her expressions in the VIP boxes, and her relationship with Kelce. Traditional NFL fans began switching channels or tuning out altogether, leading to a noticeable dip in overall viewership.

The financial impact of this backlash has been monumental. Sponsorship deals that initially blossomed from the “Swift bump” began to falter as brands reconsidered their association with the NFL. Some sponsors started fearing that the polarizing impact of Swift’s presence would overshadow their messaging and negatively impact their relationship with core football fans.

Additionally, merchandise and ticket sales started to dip. Swift’s presence at games initially spurred merchandise sales, but as traditional football fans grew more disenchanted, sales began to decline. Those who were initially drawn to the games for the spectacle seemed less interested in maintaining their new-found fandom once the novelty wore off.